Discussion about this post

User's avatar
unfuckwithable's avatar

2005 deja vu. I remember sitting in Ujjal Dosanjh's (Paul Martin's health minister, for those without long memories), when the NDP leader at the time who shall not be named personally pulled the plug on that minority government when every person in Ottawa knew it would result in a Tory win and the scrapping of two major social programs brought in by that Liberal government within a year of Harper winning. Which is exactly what happened. And for all the trouble (and setting Canada back by 15 years), the NDP only gained 11 seats on a 1.8% swing and remained the third opposition party. Short-term political thinking will be the death of us all. Or some.

Expand full comment
Dan's avatar

I think this analysis is spot on. I do not think the NDP has good options. They will always the third largest party at best and if they are too successful at the expense of the LPC they can legitimately be accused of jeopardizing the policies that they really care about.

So what to do? I think the only option is to state clearly that they are going for left of centre coalition government. Scrap the supply agreement, they need to provide ministers, be an active participant in the decision making. That would give voters something to vote for.

Now, it may help that I grew up in a European country where coalition governments were the norm. In Canada I understand that this is still a seen as something that does not work or less desirable, but why would you be prepared to do a supply agreement when you can actually have a seat at the table. Assuming you want a seat at the table.

There is one element in the article that I disagree with, I don’t think that the NDP has a leadership issue. NDP’s dilemma does not depend on the leader.

Expand full comment
7 more comments...

No posts