Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Stefan Klietsch's avatar

Just today I was listening to the audio version of Paul Wells' book on Trudeau. Wells explained that Trudeau is not an attention-seeker as much as an attention-user. Much as I am critical of the man myself and took note of his cynicism in his 2012 leadership contest announcement speech, I am not sure that he truly is much of an exceptional "narcissist". If he sacrificed his marriage for the sake of prolonging his political career, he may be currently desperate to reap continued political returns on sunk costs.

I would also object to the characterization of his 2019 and 2021 campaigns as "divisive", even if neither inspired my support. There is not anything particularly exceptional about bringing up a rival's policy record, or running on a vaccine mandate change. It does not matter if Trudeau made a policy reversal, no one is forced to oppose the policy and if there is a debate then the debate is a shared responsibility among rival parties. The country is not so fragile that it cannot handle a vaccine mandate debate, and Trudeau did not say anything outrageous in support of the policy whether or not he was entirely fair to his rivals throughout the campaign.

Despite the bridges that Trudeau has burned, he's not close to being as bad as Harper was as Prime Minister. Whereas the Trudeau era brought us a Prime Minister who was disgraceful in personal judgment and the conduct of his office, the Harper era brought us a government that every other week was insufferably testing a new precedent for the weakening of our democracy. Whatever his mistakes, Trudeau at least temporarily stemmed the tide of democratic decline, even if he perhaps did not leave much of a legacy for permanent improvement.

Expand full comment
anna1916's avatar

Evan, really? Give it a rest.

Expand full comment
17 more comments...

No posts