Discussion about this post

User's avatar
John's avatar

I knew this when they dumped Mulcair. He was the most impressive parliamentarian of all parties, and he led the NDP to a strong showing. But your average dipper doesn't want to get power, they want to be pure, and having a white man as the leader doesn't help them feel morally superior. They aren't a serious party and don't deserve votes.

Expand full comment
Victor C's avatar

the two parties strung together point is so interesting

it's true. actually, it might even be three or four.

my mp, heather mcpherson, has done incredible work (imo) as foreign affairs critic and is probably a leading *global* critic of israel and defendant of palestinians. i've tweeted that she's doing what the us college left can only wish out of aoc.

but she could never be leader, for the reasons you mention, plus as an edmonton-based mp leading what is seen as a generally anti-conventional energy / tax and spend ndp, she'd be in a similar position of failure trying to keep the edmonton or halifax seats, let alone expanding in montreal or the gta.

on a similar note - who is up next for the ndp? charlie angus? back to mulcair? olivia chow? the leading actual candidates are probably either nikki ashton or matthew green... can they bridge the gaps between the different factions of the party?

going the opposite way of the big tent parties and splitting into a couple or few different specific advocacy group parties would be very interesting, with some sort of understanding that they don't get in the way of the other former ndp groups. run the conservation party in powell river, and the serious housing party in hamilton. pro-labour and workers in london and windsor, pro-globalism/diversity in vancouver and montreal.

this way, the labour wing doesn't need to be "anti-energy". housing doesn't need to take a specific stance on israel. win more than 25 seats by figuring out which ridings are asking for each "progressive" platform and build an effective coalition that can actually apply pressure from the left

of course, the criticism will be that this just eats away at liberal votes against the conservatives in competitive ridings, but the cpc are never winning vancouver east or rosemont anyways. this might let the progressive option keep south okanagan and timmins.

if a real leader ever emerges from any of these causes, just band everyone together at that time and make a real run for government. but as it stands, they are neither a real opposition, nor an effective flank on any specific causes, and they don't seem to have the internal talent to convince anyone otherwise.

Expand full comment
6 more comments...

No posts