Discussion about this post

User's avatar
WARREN.LAYBERRY@GMAIL.COM's avatar

"Whether it meets the legal definition of treason as currently defined is a question for lawyers, of which I am mercifully not one."

I would go so far as to say I would need a trained lawyer to explain how it isn't treason; otherwise, the eye test to me certainly suggests that it is.

Emyrauld's avatar

Would it be too much to ask for some of those many loyal Canadian conservatives to take the lead in bringing the likes of Rath and Jivani to heel? This could make it a less partisan issue and other more left leaning types might have the sense to support them in this regard.

51 more comments...

No posts

Ready for more?