Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Dan's avatar

Byrne is not going anywhere. However, a former CPC operative mentioned something interesting recently. Typically leaders, or at least good leaders, surround themselves with people that compensate for their weaknesses and blind spots. With Byrne, Poilievre has hired somebody who has the same abrasive and combative traits.

As a result, the current CPC team has in earnest only one gear: attack. It will be immensively popular with 30% of the population (more in Alberta and Saskatchewan) and an enormous turn-off for the rest of the country.

Expand full comment
Pierre Dupont's avatar

Byrne ain't going nowhere and you're assuming the CPC's goal is to win a majority.

They are eminently comfortable just being the "Not- Trudeau/ANti-Trudeau" party; the Justin Trudeau majority destabilized them and when they lost two more it broke them. They are nothing but a grievance party with no policy, no outlooks, no ideas and anger as their fuel source. Thankfully for Canada, Ontario and QC have an outsized say in federal politics and, SPOILER ALERT, we in QC (Royal "We" for sure!) aren't voting for an Incel-Celebrating Milhouse Van Houten. We voted for O'Toole though, in the neighborhood, because he was the closest to a Laurentian Elite the CPC had delivered since Peter MacKay.

As to whether the CPC should be worried....only if they want a majority. If they want to keep at their current shtick, they just need to lose one more election to get their pensions and then they can go off into the private sector. Best of both worlds?

Expand full comment
9 more comments...

No posts