This election will not be won or lost on wonky policy details. It is about a feeling that Canada is broken. Carney will not be able to channel that sentiment (or perhaps the better word is rage.)
Liberals and Conservatives are both to blame for the housing and Mark Carney was the centre of it in 2008 at the Bank of Canada. Its been going on ever since... in 2008 instead of having boomers lose out we robbed furture genertations into a real esate financial ponzi scheme turning the young into indebted financial slaves who dont own propetry and have their money used (100ès of billions worth) to pump up assests of elites and boomers. Mark Carney is an economic terrorist and a threat to Canada. Evan, I know you know better. Ive enjoyed your writings on politics but I warn you against Carney. I hate conservatives but would rather see PP as PM than Mark Carney... and i really really really hate PP
Hmmm ..... so, Evan, what you are suggesting is that Carney go to Montreal and promise that the federal government, "... will govern only as much as is necessary. We do not need an overzealous Federal government trying to impose our values on provinces."
And, yes, I fully expect that Carney would a) mean precisely that; and b) actually follow through.
In Quebec. But, in the ROC he would be a typical Liberal and tell us what we should do to meet his agenda. Quebec can go on it's own way but us? We will have to follow LPC dicta.
question...single stair and development charges? doesn't single stair development bar handicap people from living there? didn't doug Ford already waive develpoment fees for his buddies leaving municipalities on the hook? adding to the tax bill for residents to absorb?..just wondering how this would work?
1) there’s ways to ensure single stair without reducing disabled mobility and the double stair rules are out of step with European countries - it can be done properly
2) he didn’t, Bonnie Crombie proposed eliminating them on everything but McMansions and funding community needs centrally instead of raising the price of housing by hundreds of thousands per unit
You strike the right notes in the « speech » that Carney should make on Dorchester Square aka Place du Canada. But most of it should be en français. I get it that English Canadians also need to hear this so maybe some of this needs to be repeated in the other language.
Please move the Liberal Party of Canada back to the centre as it was during the Chretien years.
The deal with the NDP is over so no need to cater to the left any more.
Please return the Liberals as the voice of the centre!
Thank you for your leadership!
Phil Zanotti
This election will not be won or lost on wonky policy details. It is about a feeling that Canada is broken. Carney will not be able to channel that sentiment (or perhaps the better word is rage.)
Liberals and Conservatives are both to blame for the housing and Mark Carney was the centre of it in 2008 at the Bank of Canada. Its been going on ever since... in 2008 instead of having boomers lose out we robbed furture genertations into a real esate financial ponzi scheme turning the young into indebted financial slaves who dont own propetry and have their money used (100ès of billions worth) to pump up assests of elites and boomers. Mark Carney is an economic terrorist and a threat to Canada. Evan, I know you know better. Ive enjoyed your writings on politics but I warn you against Carney. I hate conservatives but would rather see PP as PM than Mark Carney... and i really really really hate PP
Hmmm ..... so, Evan, what you are suggesting is that Carney go to Montreal and promise that the federal government, "... will govern only as much as is necessary. We do not need an overzealous Federal government trying to impose our values on provinces."
And, yes, I fully expect that Carney would a) mean precisely that; and b) actually follow through.
In Quebec. But, in the ROC he would be a typical Liberal and tell us what we should do to meet his agenda. Quebec can go on it's own way but us? We will have to follow LPC dicta.
Yup, got it.
question...single stair and development charges? doesn't single stair development bar handicap people from living there? didn't doug Ford already waive develpoment fees for his buddies leaving municipalities on the hook? adding to the tax bill for residents to absorb?..just wondering how this would work?
1) there’s ways to ensure single stair without reducing disabled mobility and the double stair rules are out of step with European countries - it can be done properly
2) he didn’t, Bonnie Crombie proposed eliminating them on everything but McMansions and funding community needs centrally instead of raising the price of housing by hundreds of thousands per unit
Boom.
You strike the right notes in the « speech » that Carney should make on Dorchester Square aka Place du Canada. But most of it should be en français. I get it that English Canadians also need to hear this so maybe some of this needs to be repeated in the other language.
Oh, I’d have him deliver it in French, I’m just not good enough to write it well in French