Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Grandma Andrea's avatar

I turn to your work daily.I enjoy it.I am very uniformed when it comes to polling however I am learning as I read and it an amazing science?!

I think as long as Poilievre continues to be just who he is we will be fine.

Thanks for the education.

Expand full comment
Dan's avatar
Apr 16Edited

Poilievre and Byrne are polling close to the percentage that Harper got in 2011. Yet, in the current circumstances it will not be enough to stop a Liberal majority. Sometimes politics can be cruel, but in this case the Conservatives will get what they deserve.

Teneycke said it at the podcast. The Poilievre and Byrne used the 20% lead to settle scores. Not only they rejected qualified and well known candidates, they also did not attract any new talent. And now it is up to Poilievre, Lantsman and Scheer trying to make the case.

In project management we do a lot of risk scenario analysis. If this happens, then we are exposed in this way. Can we mitigate the risk, is the risk mitigation worth the risk exposure? If we cannot influence risk, how do we recover if the risk materializes? It would appear that nobody in the Conservative war room gamed out the scenario of Trump verbally attacking Canada’s sovereignty and Trudeau throwing in the towel.

Both issues are indeed campaign malpractice. Poilievre and Byrne got too comfortable with their projected super majority and well attended rallies, and now they are paying the price.

Expand full comment
16 more comments...

No posts