Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Dan's avatar
May 13Edited

I think this is a bit premature. All kinds of rumours are flying around about who is in, who is out, how many ministers, junior ministers etc. Let’s wait and see what the actual complete picture is.

In any case, from what I have seen of Carney, I would expect a fairly business-like approach to cabinet positions. Ministers will receive clear mandate letters and will be expected to run their files efficiently and effectively. I suspect that underperforming ministers will be replaced rather quickly.

Regarding NES, I think he can be successful in many roles, not just housing. I would hope Carney sees this as well and uses him in a role where he develops further as a potential future leader.

EDIT: unfortunately there was indeed not an immediate role for NES to contribute to cabinet. I think this is a missed opportunity for Carney, but there are another 130 disappointed MPS in the Liberal caucus. The statement by NES was almost perfect, except for one word: “disrespected”.

Disrespected means that that he feels he was owed something. Is that based on his opinion that for him staying and taking a minister role he is owed something? If so, then he is a Prima Donna. If he was explicitly promised something, well then it is better to stay quiet and remind the people that matter he is owed a role at a later moment in time, but in the meantime he will be a good team player.

Expand full comment
Ernie Polsom's avatar

It must be exhausting to be this rage filled. Perhaps wait to see what the package and mandates look like before launching off on this type of bitter tirade?

Expand full comment
24 more comments...

No posts