The people fleeing wildfires and watching their communities burn aren’t likely impressed by Poilievre's self-serving theatre (like this filibuster nonsense and his temper tantrums about security clearance). But it's not just people losing their homes, it’s the millions living in smoke's path coping with apocalyptic haze. They aren't likely to forget the 2023 spring from hell. Next year will no doubt be another record-breaking hellscape.
Poilievre and his caucus aren’t commenting on the fires – now and then they express support for firefighters but otherwise zilch - and their supporters claim the fires are caused by arson. That’s how badly they want it not to be climate change. It’s abundantly clear the tories have zero interest in facing this issue. The impact of climate change won’t be gone before the next election, it will be more pressing than ever.
Assuming that the current government can last till 2025, what will the climate be at the time of elections? Forest fires from April to September? Floods in other areas? Increased tornado activity? If I had to pick the most likely number one topic in two years’ time, it would be climate change and the consequences.
If we are sticking to hockey themes, the puck is going to be in the corner of climate change. The liberals are already skating there, the conservatives first need to figure out where that corner is.
DK about O'Toole's plan being "idiocy on stilts" (though I love that expression!
His plan, iirc, was to offer credits on purchases, and those credits would go toward green resources and plans. It's basically a cap and trade type of thing, which has proven successful. Or it's a carbon tax that you see right away, but you get incentives from the feds.
It was at least _SOEMTHING, which Poilievre doesn't have.
I have been skimming through your last few posts. Really appreciate your work but maybe you should take a step back and think a bit more about things. Thanks
If you want to be helpful, be specific. What things and why. If you can't articulate the change you want to see, he has no reason to pay attention to what you say/
I think that Mr. Scrimshaw is really bright but him bringing up the Leafs is really weird and it derails his point. I'm not coming to him for sports takes, not enough depth and contacts for that to be a thing. But his political takes are mostly fine.
Like, give us some sort of warning if you're going to talk hockey so I can tab through.
.. excellent ! I need at least one re-read - quite an analysis run down & from way outta left field
(FYI .. I thought Sheldon Keefe was running the team.. and not the players)
Through the savagery of Poilievre Inc4 PoutinePierre & continued Character Attacks of Mr Johnston, The Report To Canadians & Government remains standing and that’s a no sweat despite the merryGoround of DroogWanks a la Michael Cooper, dazed & confused Chong & the HarperStyle Semi In The Closet Evangelicals
haha .. The embedded Partisan Yellow Journalist Gang piled on true to ‘character’ & I Claim To Say
the Most Hysterically Savage PatheticPrick so far belongs to John Ivison, whoever the fluck he is or thinks he is/was or ne’er will be.. he earned much extra points for ‘bleary eyed & confused’ and never missed a beat spewing forward manfully with epic dramatic verbal flouncing
Trudeau blew them all off the map of Canada with a perfect pitch delivery brief / press conference calling all the Snouts Out as egg sucking Oartasin Parasites In Public & Parliament while gliding through a Calm Coherent Status Quo Reality Checkin with Canadians & International News.. I kid you not.. FLAWLESS .. like it or not, he looks remarkably like the Hill That Pierre Is In Such A Hurry to Die On - I saw this online via CTV
Pierre & all The Rest plus the Yellow ‘Journalists’ look like conniving sneering boy scouts throwing firecrackers into the girls change room after phyEd Class by comparison
The people fleeing wildfires and watching their communities burn aren’t likely impressed by Poilievre's self-serving theatre (like this filibuster nonsense and his temper tantrums about security clearance). But it's not just people losing their homes, it’s the millions living in smoke's path coping with apocalyptic haze. They aren't likely to forget the 2023 spring from hell. Next year will no doubt be another record-breaking hellscape.
Poilievre and his caucus aren’t commenting on the fires – now and then they express support for firefighters but otherwise zilch - and their supporters claim the fires are caused by arson. That’s how badly they want it not to be climate change. It’s abundantly clear the tories have zero interest in facing this issue. The impact of climate change won’t be gone before the next election, it will be more pressing than ever.
Assuming that the current government can last till 2025, what will the climate be at the time of elections? Forest fires from April to September? Floods in other areas? Increased tornado activity? If I had to pick the most likely number one topic in two years’ time, it would be climate change and the consequences.
If we are sticking to hockey themes, the puck is going to be in the corner of climate change. The liberals are already skating there, the conservatives first need to figure out where that corner is.
DK about O'Toole's plan being "idiocy on stilts" (though I love that expression!
His plan, iirc, was to offer credits on purchases, and those credits would go toward green resources and plans. It's basically a cap and trade type of thing, which has proven successful. Or it's a carbon tax that you see right away, but you get incentives from the feds.
It was at least _SOEMTHING, which Poilievre doesn't have.
I have been skimming through your last few posts. Really appreciate your work but maybe you should take a step back and think a bit more about things. Thanks
If you want to be helpful, be specific. What things and why. If you can't articulate the change you want to see, he has no reason to pay attention to what you say/
I think that Mr. Scrimshaw is really bright but him bringing up the Leafs is really weird and it derails his point. I'm not coming to him for sports takes, not enough depth and contacts for that to be a thing. But his political takes are mostly fine.
Like, give us some sort of warning if you're going to talk hockey so I can tab through.
.. excellent ! I need at least one re-read - quite an analysis run down & from way outta left field
(FYI .. I thought Sheldon Keefe was running the team.. and not the players)
Through the savagery of Poilievre Inc4 PoutinePierre & continued Character Attacks of Mr Johnston, The Report To Canadians & Government remains standing and that’s a no sweat despite the merryGoround of DroogWanks a la Michael Cooper, dazed & confused Chong & the HarperStyle Semi In The Closet Evangelicals
haha .. The embedded Partisan Yellow Journalist Gang piled on true to ‘character’ & I Claim To Say
the Most Hysterically Savage PatheticPrick so far belongs to John Ivison, whoever the fluck he is or thinks he is/was or ne’er will be.. he earned much extra points for ‘bleary eyed & confused’ and never missed a beat spewing forward manfully with epic dramatic verbal flouncing
Trudeau blew them all off the map of Canada with a perfect pitch delivery brief / press conference calling all the Snouts Out as egg sucking Oartasin Parasites In Public & Parliament while gliding through a Calm Coherent Status Quo Reality Checkin with Canadians & International News.. I kid you not.. FLAWLESS .. like it or not, he looks remarkably like the Hill That Pierre Is In Such A Hurry to Die On - I saw this online via CTV
Pierre & all The Rest plus the Yellow ‘Journalists’ look like conniving sneering boy scouts throwing firecrackers into the girls change room after phyEd Class by comparison